This will be put forward as an amendment to the current Bill before the House.
The proposed amendments deviate from the current one-size-fits-all assessment model to implementing a traffic light system that would divide New Zealand into three zones depending on the likelihood of an earthquake occurring (see below for a map of the zones and click here for a list of the revised timeframes for each region).
Within these zones, buildings have different requirements:
Importantly, the Minister also said that older buildings under 34 % of the seismic standard will need to be strengthened earlier than the proposed timeframes where ‘significant alteration or upgrade work’ is being undertaken. He notes that this is similar to the existing Building Act that requires fire egress and disability upgrades to occur simultaneously with alterations and upgrades. This could be far-reaching, particularly the threshold for ‘significant’ works. For example, will it cover substantial fitouts being undertaken by tenants?
What it means to you
The proposal has major implications for commercial owners, landlords, tenants and insurers. Building owners will be able to spread the costs over a longer period. But upgrading to 34% in major cities will not meet tenant demand which is usually above 70%. For many owners, particularly in provincial areas, upgrading will be uneconomic. Also, not all owners will have the rights under their leases to effect the upgrades within the required timeframes.
Want to learn more about how this will impact you?
Kensington Swan has significant experience in advising owners, tenants and contractors on seismic issues and insurance implications in existing and new projects.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of our experts: John Meads, Ish Fraser, Stuart Robertson, or Michelle Hill.