The Property Lawyer - Volume 20, Issue 1
In the latest issue of The Property Lawyer, Partner Michelle Hill and Associate, Ekta Raniga examine a recent High Court case looks at the question of whether or not a party to a lease transaction is bound, notwithstanding that formal documentation has not been signed. In Banbrook v Tan Che Hoe & Sons (Pte) Ltd, the Court held that a tenant was bound by the transaction, despite no signed deed, for reasons including an electronic signature by email and acts of part performance.
Click here to read the full article.
ARTICLES RELATED TO PROPERTY AND REAL ESTATE
View All04.12.19 Is an arbitration clause binding on future landlords and tenants?
08.07.19 New Zealand’s new overseas investment regime
03.07.19 Commercial leases - Registration of leases, caveats and obtaining mortgagee consent
01.07.19 Property expert makes Partner in latest wave of firm promotions
19.06.19 Honey bees, collateral deeds and issues as to penalties
12.03.19 Personal guarantees in commercial leases
15.02.19 Landlords on Solid Ground with Seismic Reports?