* Home* Our Experts* Disputes Resolution Experts* Daniel Hughes
Dan Hughes | Partner
Direct: +64 9 375 1154
Mobile: +64 21 773 958
Phone: +64 9 379 4196
Fax: +64 9 309 4276

Areas of Practice
Commercial Litigation

Dispute Resolution

Restructuring and Insolvency

 

Qualifications

LLB, Victoria University, Wellington (2002).
BA, Victoria University, Wellington (2002).

Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of New Zealand (2002).

LLM (Hons), Auckland University (2006).

   

Associations

NZ Credit and Finance Institute.

INSOL New Zealand.

 

 

 

Dan Hughes

Partner, Auckland

“Robust but pragmatic advice.”

Dan is a partner in Kensington Swan’s Litigation team.

                                    

He specialises in commercial litigation with a particular focus on insolvency and the enforcement of securities. 

Dan regularly appears in Court and has appeared as senior counsel in the District Court, Maori Land Court, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

He acts for local, national and international clients, and provides litigation support for lawyers in the USA, Switzerland and Australia.     

  

In 2009, Dan assisted US lawyers in the administration of a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy. Application was made to have the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy recognised in New Zealand pursuant to the Insolvency (Cross-border) Act 2006, the first application under the new Act. (Re Pacific Northstar Property Group, LLC 29/9/09, Associate Judge Faire, HC Auckland)

                      

Other examples of Dan’s recent work include:  

Laywood v Holmes Construction Wellington Ltd [2009] NZCA 35, the leading case examining the relationship between the Construction Contracts Act and insolvency  

NZICA v Clarke (HC Auckland, 4 March 2009, Keane J), a decision involving the extent of privilege under the new provisions of the Evidence Act

Simpson v Reymer Contracting Ltd [2008] NZCCLR 17; (2008) 10 NZCLC 264, 365, a decision relating to priority of goods in insolvency

NZICA v Clarke [2009] 3 NZLR 264; (2009) 19 PRNZ 246 (HC), a decision involving the extent of privilege under the new provisions of the Evidence Act

currently defending one of the non-executive Bridgecorp directors in prosecution brought by the Securities Commission

LeisureCo New Zealand Ltd (In Liquidation), advised liquidator in obtaining significant recoveries for secured and unsecured creditors.